Lỗi opencl or nvidia cuda found trên trâu cày năm 2024

aetch wrote:I think Ubuntu had been installing security updates in the background, something got broken and it took rebooting the machine to highlight it.

I'm not asking for help, the machine is running just fine.

If it was a security update for the kernel, then the Nvidia kernel module might not have been ready to be upgraded at the same time as the kernel. As long as the Nvidia driver is compatible with the kernel, it should put itself into the kernel every time you upgrade the kernel, but something could have gone wrong in that upgrade. Good to see that it was fixed.

Online: GTX 1660 Super, GTX 1080, GTX 1050 Ti 4G OC, RX580 + occasional CPU folding in the cold. Offline: Radeon HD 7770, GTX 960, GTX 950

psaam0001 Posts: 383 Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 2:02 am Location: Ruckersville, Virginia, USA

by psaam0001 » Thu Dec 10, 2020 4:43 am

tomc001 wrote:Unfortunately, Microsoft thinks it is their computer, not yours.

And M/S can take a hike with their 16-20 character activation codes that one almost needs "Hubble Space Telescope" strength lenses to read.

Free open-source O/S > proprietary closed source O/S's in my book.

Paul

Neil-B Posts: 2027 Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 5:52 pm Hardware configuration: 1: 2x Xeon [email protected], 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, Win10 Ent 20H2, Quadro K420 1GB, FAH 7.6.21 2: Xeon [email protected], 32GB DDR4, NVME, Win10 Pro 20H2, Quadro M1000M 2GB, FAH 7.6.21 (actually have two of these) 3: [email protected], 12GB DDR3, SSD, Win10 Pro 20H2, GTX 750Ti 2GB, GTX 1080Ti 11GB, FAH 7.6.21 Location: UK

by Neil-B » Thu Dec 10, 2020 9:54 am

For me it depends on circumstances ... Free Open Source works/is best in certain environments and for certain use cases but in others not so (anecdote follows):

A large government organisation (in a country I will not identify) dropped the use of a certain enterprise software vendor (supplying proprietary closed source suite of software integral to functioning of organisation) due to the percieved high cost of annual licensing (low 8 figure annual bill) along with concerns about the tie in issues and openly mandated the use of Free Open Source alternatives (banning any new use and any further development of capability with the proprietary closed source suite of software). Five years later after trying to develop an alternative infrastructure capability and trashing all development schedules and existing capabilities whilst doing so the decision was reversed - Post mortem indicated that the impact of this attempted move to Free Open Source to save money had actually costs far more (mid 9 figure over 5 years - not factoring in damage to business) than would ever be spent on pre-existing arrangements and that the organisation had simply not been able to replicate in house using this approach anything close to the complexity or maturity of the Proprietary Closed Source capability ... Given the vendor concerned has 10,000s of developers and has been around for decades it is I suppose not surprising that a few 1000 developers in house could not replicate the functionality and robustness, but hey someone sold the Organisation Leadership on the idea Free Open Source is best.

The same organisation does however use both Windows and Linux across the estate dependant upon the specific uses/needs .. so it isn't all bad for Free Open Source

2x Xeon E5-2697v3, 512GB DDR4 LRDIMM, SSD Raid, W10-Ent, Quadro K420 Xeon E3-1505Mv5, 32GB DDR4, NVME, W10-Pro, Quadro M1000M i7-960, 12GB DDR3, SSD, W10-Pro, GTX1080Ti i9-10850K, 64GB DDR4, NVME, W11-Pro, RTX3070 (Green/Bold = Active)

psaam0001 Posts: 383 Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 2:02 am Location: Ruckersville, Virginia, USA

by psaam0001 » Thu Dec 10, 2020 2:38 pm

I was expressing a personal opinion, based on what I am now using the better part of my computing horsepower for (F@H).

However, it will be up to those who know the limitations of whether the software they need to have developed for a specific "mission critical" purpose, can function on a specific O/S, and be secure/reasonably fail-safe at the same time.

Paul

GalTriX Posts: 1 Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2023 7:50 am

by GalTriX » Fri Dec 22, 2023 8:16 am

Hello there!!

I decided to build a F@H machine w\ 2 NVIDIA 1050 that were siting around, and choose Ubuntu as OS because seemed to have better PPD.

All this is an adventure, and following the same spirit I choose also Ubuntu 23.10. Had some beginner difficulties but after Ubuntu+F@H+Nvidia Drivers consolidation good numbers start to pop up, until I rebooted.

17:10:38:WARNING:FS01:No CUDA or OpenCL 1.2+ support detected for GPU slot 01: gpu:1:0 GP107 [GeForce GTX 1050 Ti] 2138. Disabling. 17:10:38:WARNING:FS02:No CUDA or OpenCL 1.2+ support detected for GPU slot 02: gpu:3:0 GP107 [GeForce GTX 1050 LP] 1862. Disabling. 17:10:38:ERROR:No valid folding configuration

I got Disabled Status @ folding slots. Later found out that reinstalling drivers with different version got GPUs enabled, until I had to reboot, until I ran out of versions to switch.