What frameworks and controls are supported in OneTrust by default?
|
Earners of the OneTrust Certified GRC Professional badge have mastered a deep understanding of all OneTrust GRC solutions. They have demonstrated a high-level knowledge of the Enterprise Policy Management, IT Risk Management, and Audit Management, including risk frameworks, controls, and how to manage the lifecycle of risks. Show
2020 vrm expert reference guide from AnkitKumar250429 You can use risk management workflows within OneTrust to track risks from the time they are identified to the time they are mitigated or accepted. Below you'll find information on each risk management workflow stage.  IdentifiedThe workflow begins once a risk has been identified and requires a review. EvaluationIn the Evaluation stage, the scoring and quantification is set based on the level of risk observed by the business. If a risk was identified by risk-flagging rules within an assessment, the scoring and quantification details are pre-filled. The risk approver chooses to treat, reduce, or reject the risk based on the business' risk appetite. If no treatment is necessary, the approver can advance the workflow to the Monitoring stage and select an outcome. If the approver decides to treat the risk, they will create a treatment plan that includes completing specific tasks, assigning a risk owner, and adding controls to mitigate the risk. The approver can add additional owners as needed and the owners will receive a notification. TreatmentOnce a risk advances to the Treatment stage, an email is generated to the risk owner. The email notifies the risk owner that they have been assigned a risk and includes a link to the risk workflow. In the Treatment stage, the risk is actively mitigated by the risk owner. During this time, tasks are completed, control statuses are updated, and the treatment plan is executed. Risk owners can Submit the treatment or Request Exception from the approver. The treatment status is updated using the system workflow. Treatment StatusDescriptionIn Progress The risk owner is actively working on a risk. They can submit a treatment to the risk approver or request an exception. Exception Requested The risk owner requests an exception. The risk is closed in the chosen state and will not be mitigated further. The risk approver can grant the exception or send the risk back to the risk owner. Sending the plan back to the risk owner will reset the treatment status to In Progress. Under Review A treatment plan is submitted by the risk owner and is awaiting review by the risk approver. The risk approver can approve the treatment plan or send the plan back to the risk owner. Approving the risk will move the risk to the Monitoring stage. Sending the plan back to the risk owner will reset the treatment status to In Progress. Exception Granted The risk approver has granted the exception requested by the risk owner. The risk is closed in the chosen state and will not be mitigated further. Approved The risk owner completes the treatment plan and the plan is approved by the risk approver. The risk is mitigated and remains in the monitoring state. MonitoringDuring the Monitoring stage, the risk is in a closed state. In this stage, an outcome is selected, and the remaining risk level can be set based on the mitigation activities completed. Although the risk is not actively being worked on, it is being monitored. A risk approver can select an outcome from the Result options listed below. ResultDescriptionAccepted The risk level or score is at or below your risk appetite and no treatment is required. Avoided The risk was avoided by changing the processing activity, asset, or vendor so that the risk is no longer relevant. You can also develop an alternate strategy to avoid the risk. Ignored A risk is identified but is being ignored due to a lack of understanding or funding. Reduced The risk completed a defined treatment process to reduce the impact or probability of a risk event occurring. Rejected The processing activity, asset, or vendor the risk was related to was deemed too risky to continue and is rejected. The risk is not deleted for audit purposes. Bulk-manage all websites from the parent organization where you can add new websites, schedule website scans, manage cookie categories, assign geolocation rules, and publish at any time. Leverage templates to define the standard layout, styling, content, and behavior of the cookie banner, preference center, and cookie policy. Create Geolocation Rule Groups to define the consent model, template, and consent record collection option by location. Then assign each domain to a Geolocation Rule Group & publish. Learn More about Cookie Consent → What are the frameworks for risk management?Enterprise Risk Management Frameworks and Models. The Casualty Actuarial Society (CAS) ERM Framework.. The COSO ERM Integrated Framework.. The ISO 31000 ERM Framework.. The COBIT ERM Framework.. The NIST ERM Framework.. RIMS Risk Maturity Model ERM Framework.. What are the different standards and frameworks of risk management explain each one?The 5 Components of RMF. There are at least five crucial components that must be considered when creating a risk management framework. They include risk identification; risk measurement and assessment; risk mitigation; risk reporting and monitoring; and risk governance.
What is the most popular framework for risk assessment?ISO 31000 and the COSO ERM framework are the two most popular risk management standards.
What is ICT Risk Management Framework?The Risk Management Framework provides a process that integrates security, privacy, and cyber supply chain risk management activities into the system development life cycle.
|
