So sánh intel 3000 và ìtel family năm 2024

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2412Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHzBoost clock speed1050 MHz1350 MHzNumber of transistors189 million995 millionManufacturing process technology14 nm32 nmPower consumption (TDP)15 WattunknownTexture fill rate25.2013.80Floating-point performanceno data20.4 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 520 and HD Graphics 3000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 1.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4System SharedMaximum RAM amount32 GBSystem SharedMemory bus width64/128 Bit64/128 BitMemory clock speedSystem SharedSystem SharedShared memory++

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)Shader Model6.44.1OpenGL4.63.1OpenCL2.1N/AVulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 520

2.14

+229%

HD Graphics 520 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 229% in our combined benchmark results.

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 520 831

+227%

HD Graphics 520 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 227% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 520 5722

+265%

HD Graphics 520 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 265% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 520 6701

+168%

HD Graphics 520 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by 168% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p20 6−7 Full HD11 9

Performance in popular games

Full HD Low Preset

Cyberpunk 20775−6 3−4

Full HD Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey1−2 0−1 Battlefield 53−4 0−1 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare10−12

+37.5%

8−9

−37.5%

Cyberpunk 20775−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Far Cry 52−3 0−1 Far Cry New Dawn2−3 0−1 Forza Horizon 46−7

+500%

1−2

−500%

Hitman 33−4 0−1 Horizon Zero Dawn3−4 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 25−6

+150%

2−3

−150%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider8−9

+33.3%

6−7

−33.3%

Full HD High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey1−2 0−1 Battlefield 53−4 0−1 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare10−12

+37.5%

8−9

−37.5%

Cyberpunk 20775−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Far Cry 52−3 0−1 Far Cry New Dawn2−3 0−1 Forza Horizon 46−7

+500%

1−2

−500%

Hitman 33−4 0−1 Horizon Zero Dawn3−4 0−1 Metro Exodus3−4

+200%

1−2

−200%

Red Dead Redemption 25−6

+150%

2−3

−150%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider8−9

+33.3%

6−7

−33.3%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt4

+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

Full HD Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey1−2 0−1 Battlefield 53−4 0−1 Cyberpunk 20775−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Far Cry 52−3 0−1 Far Cry New Dawn2−3 0−1 Forza Horizon 46−7

+500%

1−2

−500%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt5−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

1440p High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare4−5

+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

Hitman 35−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Horizon Zero Dawn8−9

+14.3%

7−8

−14.3%

Metro Exodus1−2 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 21−2 0−1 Shadow of the Tomb Raider5−6

+25%

4−5

−25%

1440p Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 20771−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Far Cry 54−5 2−3 Forza Horizon 42−3 0−1

4K High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare2−3

+100%

1−2

−100%

Hitman 32−3

+100%

1−2

−100%

Horizon Zero Dawn7−8

+0%

7−8

+0%

Red Dead Redemption 21−2 0−1

4K Ultra Preset

Far Cry 54−5 3−4 Far Cry New Dawn6−7 5−6 Forza Horizon 42−3 0−1

This is how HD Graphics 520 and HD Graphics 3000 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

• HD Graphics 520 is 233% faster than HD Graphics 3000

1080p resolution:

• HD Graphics 520 is 22.2% faster than HD Graphics 3000

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

• in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics 520 is 200% faster than the HD Graphics 3000.

All in all, in popular games:

• HD Graphics 520 is ahead in 22 tests (92%)
• there's a draw in 2 tests (8%)

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score 2.14 0.65 Recency 1 September 2015 1 February 2011 Pipelines / CUDA cores 24 12 Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm

The HD Graphics 520 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

HD Graphics 520

HD Graphics 3000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Rate Intel HD Graphics 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate Intel HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.