What are the factors that protect against urinary tract infections?

What are the factors that protect against urinary tract infections?

Agustín Franco

What are the factors that protect against urinary tract infections?

Ascensión Gómez Porcel Nurse Urology Department

What are the factors that protect against urinary tract infections?

Pilar Luque Urologist Urology Department

What are the factors that protect against urinary tract infections?

Verónica Rico Caballero

Published: 30 March 2022
Updated: 30 March 2022

The donations that can be done through this webpage are exclusively for the benefit of Hospital Clínic of Barcelona through Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica and not for BBVA Foundation, entity that collaborates with the project of PortalClínic.

Subscribe

Receive the latest updates related to this content.

Thank you for subscribing!

If this is the first time you subscribe you will receive a confirmation email, check your inbox

An error occurred and we were unable to send your data, please try again later.

Summary

Read the full fact sheet

  • A urinary tract infection is caused by micro-organisms, usually a bacteria called Escherichia coli (E. coli).
  • The urethra, bladder, vagina or kidneys can be affected.
  • Even though urinary tract infections are very common, treatment with antibiotics may be needed, so seek advice from your doctor.

This page has been produced in consultation with and approved by:

What are the factors that protect against urinary tract infections?

What are the factors that protect against urinary tract infections?

This page has been produced in consultation with and approved by:

What are the factors that protect against urinary tract infections?

What are the factors that protect against urinary tract infections?

  • Anthrax is a rare but potentially fatal bacterial disease that occasionally infects humans.

  • The Western obsession with cleanliness may be partly responsible for the increase in allergic asthma and conditions such as rhinitis.

  • Careful prescribing of antibiotics will minimise the emergence of antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria.

  • Aspergillus is a fungus that commonly grows on rotting vegetation. It can cause asthma symptoms.

  • The simplest form of prevention for lyssavirus is to avoid close contact with bats.

Support groups

From other websites

Content disclaimer

Content on this website is provided for information purposes only. Information about a therapy, service, product or treatment does not in any way endorse or support such therapy, service, product or treatment and is not intended to replace advice from your doctor or other registered health professional. The information and materials contained on this website are not intended to constitute a comprehensive guide concerning all aspects of the therapy, product or treatment described on the website. All users are urged to always seek advice from a registered health care professional for diagnosis and answers to their medical questions and to ascertain whether the particular therapy, service, product or treatment described on the website is suitable in their circumstances. The State of Victoria and the Department of Health shall not bear any liability for reliance by any user on the materials contained on this website.

Journal Article

Tero Kontiokari,

1From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland (TK, LJ, TP, and MU); the Oulu Regional Institute of Occupational Health, Oulu, Finland (JL); and the Finnish Student Health Service, Oulu, Finland (KS).

3Address reprint requests to T Kontiokari, Department of Pediatrics, PO Box 5000, University of Oulu, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland. E-mail: .

Search for other works by this author on:

Jaana Laitinen,

1From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland (TK, LJ, TP, and MU); the Oulu Regional Institute of Occupational Health, Oulu, Finland (JL); and the Finnish Student Health Service, Oulu, Finland (KS).

Search for other works by this author on:

Leea Järvi,

1From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland (TK, LJ, TP, and MU); the Oulu Regional Institute of Occupational Health, Oulu, Finland (JL); and the Finnish Student Health Service, Oulu, Finland (KS).

Search for other works by this author on:

Tytti Pokka,

1From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland (TK, LJ, TP, and MU); the Oulu Regional Institute of Occupational Health, Oulu, Finland (JL); and the Finnish Student Health Service, Oulu, Finland (KS).

Search for other works by this author on:

Kaj Sundqvist,

1From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland (TK, LJ, TP, and MU); the Oulu Regional Institute of Occupational Health, Oulu, Finland (JL); and the Finnish Student Health Service, Oulu, Finland (KS).

Search for other works by this author on:

Matti Uhari

1From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland (TK, LJ, TP, and MU); the Oulu Regional Institute of Occupational Health, Oulu, Finland (JL); and the Finnish Student Health Service, Oulu, Finland (KS).

Search for other works by this author on:

  • PDF
  • Split View
    • Article contents
    • Figures & tables
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Supplementary Data
  • Cite

    Cite

    Tero Kontiokari, Jaana Laitinen, Leea Järvi, Tytti Pokka, Kaj Sundqvist, Matti Uhari, Dietary factors protecting women from urinary tract infection, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Volume 77, Issue 3, March 2003, Pages 600–604, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/77.3.600

    Close

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • More

Close

Navbar Search Filter Microsite Search Term Search

ABSTRACT

Background: Because urinary tract infections (UTIs) are caused by bacteria in the stool, dietary factors may affect the risk of contracting a UTI by altering the properties of the fecal bacterial flora.

Objective: We studied dietary and other risk factors for UTI in fertile women in a case-control setting.

Design: One hundred thirty-nine women from a health center for university students or from the staff of a university hospital (mean age: 30.5 y) with a diagnosis of an acute UTI were compared with 185 age-matched women with no episodes of UTIs during the past 5 y. Data on the women's dietary and other lifestyle habits were collected by questionnaire. A risk profile for UTI expressed in the form of adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs was modeled in logistic regression analysis for 107 case-control pairs with all relevant information.

Results: Frequent consumption of fresh juices, especially berry juices, and fermented milk products containing probiotic bacteria was associated with a decreased risk of recurrence of UTI: the OR for UTI was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.92) per 2 dL juice. A preference for berry juice over other juices gave an OR of 0.28 (95% CI: 0.14, 0.56). Consumption of fermented milk products ≥ 3 times/wk gave an OR of 0.21 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.66) relative to consumption < 1 time/wk. Intercourse frequency was associated with an increased risk of UTI (OR for ≥ 3 times/wk compared with < 1 time/wk: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.16, 6.2).

Conclusion: Dietary habits seem to be an important risk factor for UTI recurrence in fertile women, and dietary guidance could be a first step toward prevention.

Urinary tract infection, cystitis, risk, diet, women, lactobacilli, probiotics, milk, berry, fruit, juice

INTRODUCTION

More than half of all women experience at least one urinary tract infection (UTI) during their lifetime (1). Sexual activity and contraception methods have been found to be important risk factors for such infections and their recurrences (2–10). Genetic circumstances, such as belonging to blood groups AB or B, constitute independent risk factors in some but not all studies (6–8). UTI risk is also related to age, so that recurrences are most common in the age groups of 25–29 y and > 55 y and among those who get a first UTI at an early age (7,9). This is thought to reflect sexual activity in the younger fertile age group, the lack of estrogens among the older women (9), and genetic or long-term environmental factors in those getting a first UTI at an early age (7). In postmenopausal women, UTI risk factors also include urinary incontinence (6). Bacterial virulence properties may affect the risk of recurrence as well (11).

UTIs are an ascending infection caused by bacteria in the stool, and dietary changes can affect the bacterial flora involved. It is thus logical to assume that diet may affect the risk of contracting a UTI. This assumption is supported by reports that cranberry and cranberry-lingonberry juices are effective in preventing UTI recurrence (12,13). Other aspects of diet have been evaluated only occasionally in risk factor surveys (14–16).

All in all, there is no truly definitive explanation for why only some women get UTIs, and why recurrences tend to accumulate in the same subjects (10,16). We hypothesized that diet may explain some of this association and conducted a case-control study in women to evaluate dietary factors (especially the consumption of berries, fruit, and milk products), factors influencing energy consumption, and previously established UTI risk factors.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Study population and design

The subjects were recruited between 1993 and 1997 at 2 centers: the Finnish Student Health Service at the University of Oulu and the occupational health center for the staff of Oulu University Hospital. The cases were women who had had acute symptomatic UTI (symptoms of urination frequency, urination urgency, dysuria, hematuria, nocturia, fever, and back or flank pain) caused by Escherichia coli (≥ 105 colony forming units/mL in clean-voided midstream urine). The women entered the study within 2 wk of the culture-confirmed UTI episode. Subjects were excluded from the study if they received long-term antimicrobial prophylaxis at the time of the index UTI. The controls were selected from lists of all female students and hospital workers from the corresponding center of the case; invitations were sent to the next 2 women on the alphabetical list who were born in the same year as the case. The control was accepted if she had not experienced a UTI and had not taken any antimicrobial prophylaxis during the past 5 y. If neither of the controls replied within 2 wk or both of those chosen had to be excluded, 2 more controls were selected, up to 6 per case, so that at least one acceptable control was available for each case. There were a total of 139 case-control pairs, with a mean (± SD) age of 30.5 ± 10.5 y; 45 cases had an additional control and 1 had 2 additional controls (Table 1). One hundred nine of the cases (81%) had had more than one UTI episode. The protocol was evaluated by the Ethical Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Oulu and was found to be ethically acceptable.

TABLE 1

Baseline characteristics of the subjects according to place of recruitment: the Finnish Student Health Service at the University of Oulu (FSHS) or the occupational health center for the staff of Oulu University Hospital (OUH)

FSHS (n = 216)OUH (n = 108)
CharacteristicCasesControls1CasesControls1
Age group, y (%)         
<25  65 [60]64 [79]  2 [1]  3 [2] 
25–29  31 [29]  32 [39]  11 [5]  11 [7] 
30–54  4 [4]  4 [5]  80 [37]  79 [49] 
≥55  7 [3]  6 [4] 
Unmarried (%)  59 [55]  46 [57]  28 [13]  24 [15] 
Average no. of previous urinary tract infections  4.8  0.7  4.2  1.2 

FSHS (n = 216)OUH (n = 108)
CharacteristicCasesControls1CasesControls1
Age group, y (%)         
<25  65 [60]64 [79]  2 [1]  3 [2] 
25–29  31 [29]  32 [39]  11 [5]  11 [7] 
30–54  4 [4]  4 [5]  80 [37]  79 [49] 
≥55  7 [3]  6 [4] 
Unmarried (%)  59 [55]  46 [57]  28 [13]  24 [15] 
Average no. of previous urinary tract infections  4.8  0.7  4.2  1.2 

1

In pairs with more than one control, comparison was made between the case and the mean value of the controls. There were 93 cases with 123 controls in the FSHS group and 46 cases with 62 controls in the OUH group.

2

n in brackets.

TABLE 1

Baseline characteristics of the subjects according to place of recruitment: the Finnish Student Health Service at the University of Oulu (FSHS) or the occupational health center for the staff of Oulu University Hospital (OUH)

FSHS (n = 216)OUH (n = 108)
CharacteristicCasesControls1CasesControls1
Age group, y (%)         
<25  65 [60]64 [79]  2 [1]  3 [2] 
25–29  31 [29]  32 [39]  11 [5]  11 [7] 
30–54  4 [4]  4 [5]  80 [37]  79 [49] 
≥55  7 [3]  6 [4] 
Unmarried (%)  59 [55]  46 [57]  28 [13]  24 [15] 
Average no. of previous urinary tract infections  4.8  0.7  4.2  1.2 

FSHS (n = 216)OUH (n = 108)
CharacteristicCasesControls1CasesControls1
Age group, y (%)         
<25  65 [60]64 [79]  2 [1]  3 [2] 
25–29  31 [29]  32 [39]  11 [5]  11 [7] 
30–54  4 [4]  4 [5]  80 [37]  79 [49] 
≥55  7 [3]  6 [4] 
Unmarried (%)  59 [55]  46 [57]  28 [13]  24 [15] 
Average no. of previous urinary tract infections  4.8  0.7  4.2  1.2 

1

In pairs with more than one control, comparison was made between the case and the mean value of the controls. There were 93 cases with 123 controls in the FSHS group and 46 cases with 62 controls in the OUH group.

2

n in brackets.

Questionnaire

The subjects were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their dietary habits during the past month (Table 2), estimating the amounts of milk products (eg, milk, sour milk, yogurt, cheese, and ice cream) and fruit and berries (both fresh and prepared) consumed as well as the frequency of consumption. Pictures were provided as an aid to answering. Additionally, daily fluid intake was ascertained by means of questions on the amounts of drinks of various kinds consumed and estimates of fluid intake meal by meal. Subjects were asked to report all UTI episodes in their past history as well as the time of their first and last UTI episode. The questionnaire included detailed questions on vitamin, mineral, and calcium intakes; herbal supplement use; marital status; contraception use; coital frequency; exercise; constipation; previous morbidity; and medication use.

TABLE 2

Questionnaire on dietary habits

VariableClassification
Frequency of consumption during the past month   
Milk (fresh or fermented with probiotics)  Never, <1 time/wk, 1 to <3 times/wk, ≥3 times/wk 
Berries or fruit (fresh or prepared)   
Average consumption of the products during the past month   
Milk, sour milk, and yogurtGlasses (2 dL)/d 
Cheese (fresh or fermented)  g/d 
Other milk products (which?)  dL/wk 
Milk products in other foods  dL/wk 
Berries and fruit (fresh or prepared)No. of portions (≈100 g)/wk 
Juices (fresh or concentrate)Glasses (2 dL)/d 
Soft drinks (normal, diet, or sport)  Glasses (2 dL)/d 
Coffee, tea, or cocoa  Cups (1.5 dL)/d 
Use of any drink  dL/d 
Sweeteners in foods and drinks   
Sucrose  tsp/d
Fructose  tsp/d
Other, what?   
Preferred juice  What? 
Any disease or special diet  No, yes (if yes, what?) 
Vitamin, mineral, and herbal supplement use  No, yes (if yes, what?) 

VariableClassification
Frequency of consumption during the past month   
Milk (fresh or fermented with probiotics)  Never, <1 time/wk, 1 to <3 times/wk, ≥3 times/wk 
Berries or fruit (fresh or prepared)   
Average consumption of the products during the past month   
Milk, sour milk, and yogurtGlasses (2 dL)/d 
Cheese (fresh or fermented)  g/d 
Other milk products (which?)  dL/wk 
Milk products in other foods  dL/wk 
Berries and fruit (fresh or prepared)No. of portions (≈100 g)/wk 
Juices (fresh or concentrate)Glasses (2 dL)/d 
Soft drinks (normal, diet, or sport)  Glasses (2 dL)/d 
Coffee, tea, or cocoa  Cups (1.5 dL)/d 
Use of any drink  dL/d 
Sweeteners in foods and drinks   
Sucrose  tsp/d
Fructose  tsp/d
Other, what?   
Preferred juice  What? 
Any disease or special diet  No, yes (if yes, what?) 
Vitamin, mineral, and herbal supplement use  No, yes (if yes, what?) 

1

Subjects were asked to report Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus GG, and other specific probiotics separately.

2

Subjects were asked to report apple, banana, blueberry, cloudberry, cranberry, currant, lingonberry, raspberry, strawberry, orange, pineapple, and other fruit or berries separately.

3

Subjects were asked to report apple, banana, blueberry, cloudberry, cranberry, currant, lingonberry, raspberry, strawberry, orange, pineapple, and other fruit or berry juices separately.

4

1 teaspoon (tsp) = 4.93 mL.

TABLE 2

Questionnaire on dietary habits

VariableClassification
Frequency of consumption during the past month   
Milk (fresh or fermented with probiotics)  Never, <1 time/wk, 1 to <3 times/wk, ≥3 times/wk 
Berries or fruit (fresh or prepared)   
Average consumption of the products during the past month   
Milk, sour milk, and yogurtGlasses (2 dL)/d 
Cheese (fresh or fermented)  g/d 
Other milk products (which?)  dL/wk 
Milk products in other foods  dL/wk 
Berries and fruit (fresh or prepared)No. of portions (≈100 g)/wk 
Juices (fresh or concentrate)Glasses (2 dL)/d 
Soft drinks (normal, diet, or sport)  Glasses (2 dL)/d 
Coffee, tea, or cocoa  Cups (1.5 dL)/d 
Use of any drink  dL/d 
Sweeteners in foods and drinks   
Sucrose  tsp/d
Fructose  tsp/d
Other, what?   
Preferred juice  What? 
Any disease or special diet  No, yes (if yes, what?) 
Vitamin, mineral, and herbal supplement use  No, yes (if yes, what?) 

VariableClassification
Frequency of consumption during the past month   
Milk (fresh or fermented with probiotics)  Never, <1 time/wk, 1 to <3 times/wk, ≥3 times/wk 
Berries or fruit (fresh or prepared)   
Average consumption of the products during the past month   
Milk, sour milk, and yogurtGlasses (2 dL)/d 
Cheese (fresh or fermented)  g/d 
Other milk products (which?)  dL/wk 
Milk products in other foods  dL/wk 
Berries and fruit (fresh or prepared)No. of portions (≈100 g)/wk 
Juices (fresh or concentrate)Glasses (2 dL)/d 
Soft drinks (normal, diet, or sport)  Glasses (2 dL)/d 
Coffee, tea, or cocoa  Cups (1.5 dL)/d 
Use of any drink  dL/d 
Sweeteners in foods and drinks   
Sucrose  tsp/d
Fructose  tsp/d
Other, what?   
Preferred juice  What? 
Any disease or special diet  No, yes (if yes, what?) 
Vitamin, mineral, and herbal supplement use  No, yes (if yes, what?) 

1

Subjects were asked to report Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus GG, and other specific probiotics separately.

2

Subjects were asked to report apple, banana, blueberry, cloudberry, cranberry, currant, lingonberry, raspberry, strawberry, orange, pineapple, and other fruit or berries separately.

3

Subjects were asked to report apple, banana, blueberry, cloudberry, cranberry, currant, lingonberry, raspberry, strawberry, orange, pineapple, and other fruit or berry juices separately.

4

1 teaspoon (tsp) = 4.93 mL.

Fresh juice was defined as a freshly squeezed juice or a juice made from concentrate to resemble 100% freshly squeezed juice with no added sweeteners. Other juices were drinks diluted with water or sweetened with sucrose or other sweeteners.

Statistics

The statistical analyses were based on 139 case-control pairs. If a case had more than one control, the mean value for the controls was used. All variables were first analyzed separately. Next, the frequency of consumption of all milk products, fermented milk products containing probiotic bacteria (yogurt, sour milk, and cheese), fruit products (fresh or prepared), and berry products (fresh or prepared) was first summed, and the resulting sum variables were recoded as < 1 time/wk, 1 to < 3 times/wk, and ≥ 3 times/wk. Recoding was done because the number of subjects in the “never” category was practically zero after summing. Calcium intake was estimated by summing calcium from milk products and supplementary products such as calcium tablets as grams per day. These summary variables were used as estimates for both the amounts and frequencies in the analyses.

This case-control study was the first stage of our controlled randomized intervention trial, the results of which have already been published (12). The sample size was calculated on the basis of the requirements for that clinical trial, and no a priori estimates of the odds ratios (ORs) likely to be found in this case-control study were decided. Univariate logistic regression was used to calculate ORs with 95% CIs separately for all the variables among the 139 pairs, and a risk profile was then constructed in terms of adjusted ORs with 95% CIs by multivariate forward stepwise logistic regression. All the necessary information was available for 107 of the 139 case-control pairs, and these were used for the modeling analyses. The statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS for WINDOWS, version 10.1.4 (SPSS Inc, Chicago).

RESULTS

The multivariate modeling showed an enhanced consumption of fresh fruit or berry juice to be associated with a lower risk of UTI recurrence, an effect that was enhanced by a preference for berry juice over other juices (Table 3). Frequent consumption of fermented milk products containing probiotic bacteria such as Lactobacillus acidophilus or Lactobacillus GG was more common among the controls than among the cases, whereas frequent intercourse was associated with an increased risk of UTI (Table 3).

TABLE 3

Risk factors for urinary tract infection estimated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs in a multivariate forward stepwise logistic regression model including 107 case-control pairs with all relevant information

VariableCasesControls1OR (95% CI)P2
Decreased risk         
Mean daily use of fresh juice (fruit or berry) (dL)  1.84  2.24  0.66 (0.48, 0.92)0.011 
Fresh berry juice preferred over other fresh juices        0.001 
No (comparison)  82  63   
Yes  25  44  0.28 (0.14, 0.56)   
Milk products with probiotics (yogurt, sour milk, cheese)        0.003 
<1 time/wk (comparison)  19   
1 to <3 times/wk  12  18  0.12 (0.03, 0.47)   
≥3 times/wk  76  85  0.21 (0.06, 0.66)   
Increased risk         
Intercourse frequency        0.031 
<1 time/wk (comparison)  24  35   
1 to <3 times/wk  48  54  1.12 (0.55, 2.28)   
≥3 times/wk  35  18  2.70 (1.16, 6.2)   

VariableCasesControls1OR (95% CI)P2
Decreased risk         
Mean daily use of fresh juice (fruit or berry) (dL)  1.84  2.24  0.66 (0.48, 0.92)0.011 
Fresh berry juice preferred over other fresh juices        0.001 
No (comparison)  82  63   
Yes  25  44  0.28 (0.14, 0.56)   
Milk products with probiotics (yogurt, sour milk, cheese)        0.003 
<1 time/wk (comparison)  19   
1 to <3 times/wk  12  18  0.12 (0.03, 0.47)   
≥3 times/wk  76  85  0.21 (0.06, 0.66)   
Increased risk         
Intercourse frequency        0.031 
<1 time/wk (comparison)  24  35   
1 to <3 times/wk  48  54  1.12 (0.55, 2.28)   
≥3 times/wk  35  18  2.70 (1.16, 6.2)   

1

In pairs with more than one control, comparison was made between the case and the mean value of the controls.

2

Indicates the significance of each variable in the multivariate logistic regression model.

3

OR calculated per 2 dL.

TABLE 3

Risk factors for urinary tract infection estimated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs in a multivariate forward stepwise logistic regression model including 107 case-control pairs with all relevant information

VariableCasesControls1OR (95% CI)P2
Decreased risk         
Mean daily use of fresh juice (fruit or berry) (dL)  1.84  2.24  0.66 (0.48, 0.92)0.011 
Fresh berry juice preferred over other fresh juices        0.001 
No (comparison)  82  63   
Yes  25  44  0.28 (0.14, 0.56)   
Milk products with probiotics (yogurt, sour milk, cheese)        0.003 
<1 time/wk (comparison)  19   
1 to <3 times/wk  12  18  0.12 (0.03, 0.47)   
≥3 times/wk  76  85  0.21 (0.06, 0.66)   
Increased risk         
Intercourse frequency        0.031 
<1 time/wk (comparison)  24  35   
1 to <3 times/wk  48  54  1.12 (0.55, 2.28)   
≥3 times/wk  35  18  2.70 (1.16, 6.2)   

VariableCasesControls1OR (95% CI)P2
Decreased risk         
Mean daily use of fresh juice (fruit or berry) (dL)  1.84  2.24  0.66 (0.48, 0.92)0.011 
Fresh berry juice preferred over other fresh juices        0.001 
No (comparison)  82  63   
Yes  25  44  0.28 (0.14, 0.56)   
Milk products with probiotics (yogurt, sour milk, cheese)        0.003 
<1 time/wk (comparison)  19   
1 to <3 times/wk  12  18  0.12 (0.03, 0.47)   
≥3 times/wk  76  85  0.21 (0.06, 0.66)   
Increased risk         
Intercourse frequency        0.031 
<1 time/wk (comparison)  24  35   
1 to <3 times/wk  48  54  1.12 (0.55, 2.28)   
≥3 times/wk  35  18  2.70 (1.16, 6.2)   

1

In pairs with more than one control, comparison was made between the case and the mean value of the controls.

2

Indicates the significance of each variable in the multivariate logistic regression model.

3

OR calculated per 2 dL.

Variables that appeared as significant risk factors for UTI in univariate modeling but that were not included in the risk profile obtained by multivariate modeling included several factors associated with an increased risk of UTI (Table 4). The amount or frequency of the consumption of fresh milk products, coffee, tea, and soft drinks had no significant effect on UTI risk. The total volume of daily fluids was ≈1.6 L in both groups, and this was not associated with UTI risk. Also not associated with UTI risk were intake of vitamins (including vitamin C), minerals (including calcium), and herbal preparations; other diseases; constipation; contraception methods; menstrual hygiene; exercise; and age at the first UTI.

TABLE 4

Risk factors for urinary tract infection (UTI) estimated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and P values for 139 case-control pairs1

VariableOR (95% CI)P
Decreased risk     
Raspberry, fresh    <0.001 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.31 (0.18, 0.53)   
<1 to < 3 times/wk  0.43 (0.16, 1.16)   
≥3 times/wk  86 (0, 1 × 2.712)   
Lingonberry, fresh    0.001 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.31 (0.17, 0.57)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.27 (0.12, 0.62)   
≥3 times/wk  0.63 (0.16, 2.5)   
Strawberry, fresh    0.002 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.24 (0.11, 0.54)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.19 (0.08, 0.46)   
≥3 times/wk  0.28 (0.04, 2.3)   
Raspberry, prepared    0.002 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.37 (0.22, 0.62)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.38 (0.14, 1.02)   
≥3 times/wk  0.39 (0.82, 1.8)   
Currant, fresh    0.003 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.34 (0.19, 0.6)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.35 (0.15, 0.83)   
≥3 times/wk  0.9 (0.10, 1.9)   
Cranberry, prepared    0.03 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.48 (0.25, 0.92)   
1 to <3 times/wk  No cases   
≥3 times/wk  No cases   
Cloudberry, prepared    0.04 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.54 (0.33, 0.89)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.31 (0.09, 1.1)   
≥3 times/wk  0.004 (0, 1 × 108)   
Lactobacillus acidophilus yogurt    0.003 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.41 (0.24, 0.69)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.33 (0.14, 0.76)   
≥3 times/wk  0.75 (0.22, 2.6)   
Lactobacillus GG sour milk    0.02 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.47 (0.25, 0.86)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.18 (0.04, 0.86)   
≥3 times/wk  0.81 (0.11, 5.9)   
Light yogurt    0.048 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.55 (0.33, 0.92)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.38 (0.14, 0.99)   
≥3 times/wk  1.1 (0.31, 4.2)   
Increased risk     
Previous no. of UTIs, per episode  1.5 (1.4, 1.8)  <0.001 
Previous gynecologic infections, per episode  1.5 (1.1, 1.9)  0.003 
Amount of sweetened juice concentrate, per 2 dL  1.3 (1.04, 1.6)  0.02 
Added sucrose, per tsp1.1 (1.01, 1.3)  0.03 

VariableOR (95% CI)P
Decreased risk     
Raspberry, fresh    <0.001 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.31 (0.18, 0.53)   
<1 to < 3 times/wk  0.43 (0.16, 1.16)   
≥3 times/wk  86 (0, 1 × 2.712)   
Lingonberry, fresh    0.001 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.31 (0.17, 0.57)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.27 (0.12, 0.62)   
≥3 times/wk  0.63 (0.16, 2.5)   
Strawberry, fresh    0.002 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.24 (0.11, 0.54)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.19 (0.08, 0.46)   
≥3 times/wk  0.28 (0.04, 2.3)   
Raspberry, prepared    0.002 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.37 (0.22, 0.62)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.38 (0.14, 1.02)   
≥3 times/wk  0.39 (0.82, 1.8)   
Currant, fresh    0.003 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.34 (0.19, 0.6)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.35 (0.15, 0.83)   
≥3 times/wk  0.9 (0.10, 1.9)   
Cranberry, prepared    0.03 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.48 (0.25, 0.92)   
1 to <3 times/wk  No cases   
≥3 times/wk  No cases   
Cloudberry, prepared    0.04 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.54 (0.33, 0.89)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.31 (0.09, 1.1)   
≥3 times/wk  0.004 (0, 1 × 108)   
Lactobacillus acidophilus yogurt    0.003 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.41 (0.24, 0.69)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.33 (0.14, 0.76)   
≥3 times/wk  0.75 (0.22, 2.6)   
Lactobacillus GG sour milk    0.02 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.47 (0.25, 0.86)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.18 (0.04, 0.86)   
≥3 times/wk  0.81 (0.11, 5.9)   
Light yogurt    0.048 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.55 (0.33, 0.92)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.38 (0.14, 0.99)   
≥3 times/wk  1.1 (0.31, 4.2)   
Increased risk     
Previous no. of UTIs, per episode  1.5 (1.4, 1.8)  <0.001 
Previous gynecologic infections, per episode  1.5 (1.1, 1.9)  0.003 
Amount of sweetened juice concentrate, per 2 dL  1.3 (1.04, 1.6)  0.02 
Added sucrose, per tsp1.1 (1.01, 1.3)  0.03 

1

Variables expressed here were significant in the univariate logistic regression model but not in the multivariate model with 107 pairs.

2

1 teaspoon (tsp) = 4.93 mL.

TABLE 4

Risk factors for urinary tract infection (UTI) estimated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and P values for 139 case-control pairs1

VariableOR (95% CI)P
Decreased risk     
Raspberry, fresh    <0.001 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.31 (0.18, 0.53)   
<1 to < 3 times/wk  0.43 (0.16, 1.16)   
≥3 times/wk  86 (0, 1 × 2.712)   
Lingonberry, fresh    0.001 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.31 (0.17, 0.57)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.27 (0.12, 0.62)   
≥3 times/wk  0.63 (0.16, 2.5)   
Strawberry, fresh    0.002 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.24 (0.11, 0.54)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.19 (0.08, 0.46)   
≥3 times/wk  0.28 (0.04, 2.3)   
Raspberry, prepared    0.002 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.37 (0.22, 0.62)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.38 (0.14, 1.02)   
≥3 times/wk  0.39 (0.82, 1.8)   
Currant, fresh    0.003 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.34 (0.19, 0.6)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.35 (0.15, 0.83)   
≥3 times/wk  0.9 (0.10, 1.9)   
Cranberry, prepared    0.03 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.48 (0.25, 0.92)   
1 to <3 times/wk  No cases   
≥3 times/wk  No cases   
Cloudberry, prepared    0.04 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.54 (0.33, 0.89)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.31 (0.09, 1.1)   
≥3 times/wk  0.004 (0, 1 × 108)   
Lactobacillus acidophilus yogurt    0.003 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.41 (0.24, 0.69)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.33 (0.14, 0.76)   
≥3 times/wk  0.75 (0.22, 2.6)   
Lactobacillus GG sour milk    0.02 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.47 (0.25, 0.86)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.18 (0.04, 0.86)   
≥3 times/wk  0.81 (0.11, 5.9)   
Light yogurt    0.048 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.55 (0.33, 0.92)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.38 (0.14, 0.99)   
≥3 times/wk  1.1 (0.31, 4.2)   
Increased risk     
Previous no. of UTIs, per episode  1.5 (1.4, 1.8)  <0.001 
Previous gynecologic infections, per episode  1.5 (1.1, 1.9)  0.003 
Amount of sweetened juice concentrate, per 2 dL  1.3 (1.04, 1.6)  0.02 
Added sucrose, per tsp1.1 (1.01, 1.3)  0.03 

VariableOR (95% CI)P
Decreased risk     
Raspberry, fresh    <0.001 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.31 (0.18, 0.53)   
<1 to < 3 times/wk  0.43 (0.16, 1.16)   
≥3 times/wk  86 (0, 1 × 2.712)   
Lingonberry, fresh    0.001 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.31 (0.17, 0.57)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.27 (0.12, 0.62)   
≥3 times/wk  0.63 (0.16, 2.5)   
Strawberry, fresh    0.002 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.24 (0.11, 0.54)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.19 (0.08, 0.46)   
≥3 times/wk  0.28 (0.04, 2.3)   
Raspberry, prepared    0.002 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.37 (0.22, 0.62)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.38 (0.14, 1.02)   
≥3 times/wk  0.39 (0.82, 1.8)   
Currant, fresh    0.003 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.34 (0.19, 0.6)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.35 (0.15, 0.83)   
≥3 times/wk  0.9 (0.10, 1.9)   
Cranberry, prepared    0.03 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.48 (0.25, 0.92)   
1 to <3 times/wk  No cases   
≥3 times/wk  No cases   
Cloudberry, prepared    0.04 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.54 (0.33, 0.89)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.31 (0.09, 1.1)   
≥3 times/wk  0.004 (0, 1 × 108)   
Lactobacillus acidophilus yogurt    0.003 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.41 (0.24, 0.69)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.33 (0.14, 0.76)   
≥3 times/wk  0.75 (0.22, 2.6)   
Lactobacillus GG sour milk    0.02 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.47 (0.25, 0.86)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.18 (0.04, 0.86)   
≥3 times/wk  0.81 (0.11, 5.9)   
Light yogurt    0.048 
Never (comparison)  1.0   
<1 time/wk  0.55 (0.33, 0.92)   
1 to <3 times/wk  0.38 (0.14, 0.99)   
≥3 times/wk  1.1 (0.31, 4.2)   
Increased risk     
Previous no. of UTIs, per episode  1.5 (1.4, 1.8)  <0.001 
Previous gynecologic infections, per episode  1.5 (1.1, 1.9)  0.003 
Amount of sweetened juice concentrate, per 2 dL  1.3 (1.04, 1.6)  0.02 
Added sucrose, per tsp1.1 (1.01, 1.3)  0.03 

1

Variables expressed here were significant in the univariate logistic regression model but not in the multivariate model with 107 pairs.

2

1 teaspoon (tsp) = 4.93 mL.

DISCUSSION

The consumption of fresh juices, especially juices prepared from berries, was more common among the women who had not experienced a UTI recently. This protective effect was not associated with the total volume of liquid consumed, which was virtually equal in both groups. Our finding agrees with earlier intervention trials in which cranberry and cranberry-lingonberry juices were found to provide protection from bacteruria and UTI recurrence (12,13). It is notable that during the time of this trial in our country, no recommendations were given to patients with UTIs to consume cranberry juice or any other juices to prevent UTI, which obviously would have weakened the protective association found here. Most berries, especially those of the genus Vaccinium, are rich in flavonols, such as epicatechin (17), which is a potent inhibitor of the adhesion of coliform bacteria to human cells (18,19). Plants produce flavonols in response to microbial infection, suggesting a role for these substances in antimicrobial defense (20). Some fruit such as apples, cherries, and plums are rich in epicatechin, but in general the flavonol content of berries is higher (17), which may explain their association with reduced UTI recurrence. It is impossible from our results to make any comparisons between different berries or fruit in terms of their capacity to prevent UTI because some of the products were consumed only seasonally.

Frequent consumption of fermented milk products containing probiotics was associated with a low incidence of UTI recurrence, whereas no such association was found for fresh milk products. Thus, it is possible that the protective effect is related more to the probiotics in these products than to the milk itself. Lactobacilli of the kind found in fermented milk can colonize the human intestine and replace coliform bacteria (21,22) and have been shown to be effective in preventing UTI recurrence when administered intravaginally (23) and to restore urogenital flora when administered orally (24). We failed, however, in a randomized controlled intervention trial to ascribe any clinical efficacy to oral ingestion of a Lactobacillus GG drink as protection against UTI (13). This may indicate differences between the lactobacilli strains in their preventive effect, or it may mean that the additional dose used in our intervention trial was too low to cause any significant difference between the intervention and control groups. In the present survey, most of the women consumed fermented milk products containing probiotics several times per week. The variation in the doses reported by the present respondents was great enough to demonstrate the protective effect of such products. In particular, there were more women avoiding milk products with probiotics or using them only occasionally among the cases than among the controls.

In line with earlier findings (4,5), intakes of vitamins, minerals, and herbal supplements; methods of menstrual hygiene; or constipation were not associated with the risk of UTI. Contrary to the report of Apicella et al (25), we did not find daily calcium intake to have any effect on UTI risk. Total daily drinking volume had no effect on UTI risk and was practically the same in both groups, which also agrees with earlier reports (4,5). The UTI-promoting effects of sweetened juice concentrates and added sucrose that were apparent when analyzed separately but that disappeared in the multivariate model may merely reflect the fact that these products are consumed as alternatives to fresh juices.

Frequent intercourse remained the only nondietary factor affecting the risk of UTI. This was documented previously (2–10). The number of gynecologic infections increased the risk of UTI when analyzed separately, but this effect disappeared in the multivariate model. It is thus probable that gynecologic infections reflect sexual activity in these women and, thus, that multivariate modeling excludes these women from the final risk profile. None of the subjects in our survey used a diaphragm or spermicides, which were found earlier to increase the risk of UTI (4,5,7,10); condom use or the other contraceptive methods used here were not associated with risk.

The risk for UTI recurrence is highest for ≈3 mo after the initial UTI episode, and recurrences tend to accumulate to the same individuals (10,16). This has been suggested to reflect changes in the periurethral bacterial flora, possibly resulting from antimicrobial use (10,16). The relation could be also genetic, reflecting urinary tract anatomy or immunologic differences suggested by ABO blood group dependency (7,8). An association of previous UTIs and the risk of recurrence was found in this survey also but disappeared in the multivariate analysis, suggesting that the accumulation of UTIs to the same persons could be due to the long-term existence of dietary and hygienic factors affecting UTI risk.

In conclusion, we found several dietary factors to be associated with a lowered risk of UTI, including the amount of fresh juice consumed, especially berry juice. The effect of berries in preventing UTI may thus be even greater than was seen in intervention trials. Fermented milk products containing probiotic bacteria also appeared to be associated with a lower risk of UTI. Thus, dietary guidance may be a first step toward preventing UTIs in women.

We thank Eeva-Liisa Lesonen and Tuulikki Ryhänen for recruitment of the women to this trial at the health center for the staff of Oulu University Hospital.

MU initiated and coordinated the formulation of the primary study hypothesis. Together with JL, LJ, KS, and TK, he discussed core ideas, designed the study protocol, and participated in the data analysis, interpretation of the results, and writing of the paper. TK participated in the formulation of the study hypothesis and design, was responsible for coordinating patient collection, was responsible for data entry, and participated in the analysis and interpretation of the results and the writing of the paper. Both MU and TK are guarantors of the content of the paper. KS recruited the study subjects at the Finnish Student Health Service and participated in the formulation of the study hypothesis and design and interpretation of the results and contributed to the paper. LJ and JL formulated the dietary questionnaires and participated in their interpretation. TP was responsible for the statistical analysis of the data and participated in the interpretation of the results and contributed to the design and writing of the paper. There were no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1

Foxman

B

,

Barlow

R

,

D'Arcy

H

,

Gillespie

B

,

Sobel

JD

.

Urinary tract infection: self-reported incidence and associated costs

.

Ann Epidemiol

2000

;

10

:

509

15

.

2

Kelsey

MC

,

Mead

MG

,

Gruneberg

RN

,

Oriel

JD

.

Relationship between sexual intercourse and urinary-tract infection in women attending a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases

.

J Med Microbiol

1979

;

12

:

511

2

.

3

Nicolle

LE

,

Harding

GK

,

Preiksaitis

J

,

Ronald

AR

.

The association of urinary tract infection with sexual intercourse

.

J Infect Dis

1982

;

146

:

579

83

.

4

Remis

RS

,

Gurwith

MJ

,

Gurwith

D

,

Hargrett-Bean

NT

,

Layde

PM

.

Risk factors for urinary tract infection

.

Am J Epidemiol

1987

;

126

:

685

94

.

5

Strom

BL

,

Collins

M

,

West

SL

,

Kreisberg

J

,

Weller

S

.

Sexual activity, contraceptive use, and other risk factors for symptomatic and asymptomatic bacteriuria. A case-control study

.

Ann Intern Med

1987

;

107

:

816

23

.

6

Raz

R

,

Gennesin

Y

,

Wasser

J

, et al. 

Recurrent urinary tract infections in postmenopausal women

.

Clin Infect Dis

2000

;

30

:

152

6

.

7

Scholes

D

,

Hooton

TM

,

Roberts

PL

,

Stapleton

AE

,

Gupta

K

,

Stamm

WE

.

Risk factors for recurrent urinary tract infection in young women

.

J Infect Dis

2000

;

182

:

1177

82

.

8

Kinane

DF

,

Blackwell

CC

,

Brettle

RP

,

Weir

DM

,

Winstanley

FP

,

Elton

RA

.

ABO blood group, secretor state, and susceptibility to recurrent urinary tract infection in women

.

Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)

1982

;

285

:

7

9

.

9

Ikäheimo

R

,

Siitonen

A

,

Heiskanen

T

, et al. 

Recurrence of urinary tract infection in a primary care setting: analysis of a 1-year follow-up of 179 women

.

Clin Infect Dis

1996

;

22

:

91

9

.

10

Foxman

B

,

Gillespie

B

,

Koopman

J

, et al. 

Risk factors for second urinary tract infection among college women

.

Am J Epidemiol

2000

;

151

:

1194

205

.

11

Foxman

B

,

Zhang

L

,

Tallman

P

, et al. 

Virulence characteristics of Escherichia coli causing first urinary tract infection predict risk of second infection

.

J Infect Dis

1995

;

172

:

1536

41

.

12

Avorn

J

,

Monane

M

,

Gurwitz

JH

,

Glynn

RJ

,

Choodnovskiy

I

,

Lipsitz

LA

.

Reduction of bacteriuria and pyuria after ingestion of cranberry juice

.

JAMA

1994

;

271

:

751

4

.

13

Kontiokari

T

,

Sundqvist

K

,

Nuutinen

M

,

Pokka

T

,

Koskela

M

,

Uhari

M

.

Randomised trial of cranberry-lingonberry juice and Lactobacillus GG drink for the prevention of urinary tract infections in women

.

BMJ

2001

;

322

:

1571

3

.

14

Leibovici

L

,

Alpert

G

,

Kalter-Leibovici

O

,

Danon

YL

.

Risk factors for recurrence of symptomatic urinary tract infection in young women

.

Isr J Med Sci

1989

;

25

:

110

1

.

15

Foxman

B

,

Frerichs

RR

.

Epidemiology of urinary tract infection: II. Diet, clothing, and urination habits

.

Am J Public Health

1985

;

75

:

1314

7

.

16

Foxman

B

,

Somsel

P

,

Tallman

P

, et al. 

Urinary tract infection among women aged 40 to 65: behavioural and sexual risk factors

.

J Clin Epidemiol

2001

;

54

:

710

8

.

17

Pascual-Teresa

S

,

Santos-Buelga

C

,

Rivas-Gonzalo

JC

.

Quantitative analysis of flavan-3-ols in Spanish foodstuffs and beverages

.

J Agric Food Chem

2000

;

48

:

5331

7

.

18

Howell

AB

,

Vorsa

N

,

Der

Marderosian A

,

Foo

LY

.

Inhibition of the adherence of P-fimbriated Escherichia coli to uroepithelial-cell surfaces by proanthocyanidin extracts from cranberries

.

N Engl J Med

1998

;

339

:

1085

6

.

19

Foo

LY

,

Lu

Y

,

Howell

AB

,

Vorsa

N

.

The structure of cranberry proanthocyanidins which inhibit adherence of uropathogenic P-fimbriated Escherichia coli in vitro

.

Phytochemistry

2000

;

54

:

173

81

.

20

Scalbert

A

.

Antimicrobial properties of tannins

.

Phytochemistry

1991

;

30

:

3875

83

.

21

Chan

RC

,

Reid

G

,

Irvin

RT

,

Bruce

AW

,

Costerton

JW

.

Competitive exclusion of uropathogens from human uroepithelial cells by Lactobacillus whole cells and cell wall fragments

.

Infect Immun

1985

;

47

:

84

9

.

22

Saxelin

M

,

Pessi

T

,

Salminen

S

.

Fecal recovery following oral administration of Lactobacillus strain GG (ATCC 53103) in gelatine capsules to healthy volunteers

.

Int J Food Microbiol

1995

;

25

:

199

203

.

23

Bruce

AW

,

Reid

G

.

Intravaginal instillation of lactobacilli for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections

.

Can J Microbiol

1988

;

34

:

339

43

.

24

Reid

G

,

Beuerman

D

,

Heinemann

C

,

Bruce

AW

.

Probiotic Lactobacillus dose required to restore and maintain a normal vaginal flora

.

FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol

2001

;

32

:

37

41

.

25

Apicella

LL

,

Sobota

AE

.

Increased risk of urinary tract infection associated with the use of calcium supplements

.

Urol Res

1990

;

18

:

213

7

.

FOOTNOTES

2

Supported by the Juho Vainio, Yrjö Jahnsson, and Alma and KA Snellman Foundations and the Finnish Academy.

© 2003 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

© 2003 American Society for Clinical Nutrition

Citations

Views

Altmetric

Email alerts

More on this topic

Citing articles via

  • Latest

  • Most Read

  • Most Cited

More from Oxford Academic

What protects the urinary tract from infection?

Epithelial cells. The epithelial cells lining the urinary tract are the first line of defence against pathogens. These cells secrete a plethora of soluble compounds ranging from pro-inflammatory cytokines to antibacterial agents.

What are four 4 ways to prevent urinary tract infections?

9 ways to prevent a UTI.
Wipe front to back. Since the rectum is a main source of E. ... .
Drink plenty of fluids. Stay hydrated throughout the day. ... .
Avoid holding your pee. ... .
Urinate before and after sex. ... .
Avoid scented products. ... .
Explore birth control options. ... .
Take probiotics. ... .
Get antibiotics..

How can we protect the urinary system?

15 Tips To Keep Your Bladder Healthy.
Use the bathroom often and when needed. ... .
Be in a relaxed position while urinating. ... .
Take enough time to fully empty the bladder when urinating. ... .
Wipe from front to back after using the toilet. ... .
Urinate after sex. ... .
Do pelvic floor muscle exercises..