So sánh ryzen 7 1700 và i7 8700k

Comparing Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 1700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingValue for money14.7716.58Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processorSeriesIntel Core i7AMD Ryzen 7Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-S (2017−2018)Zen (2017−2020)Release date24 September 2017 (6 years old)22 February 2017 (6 years old)Launch price (MSRP)$359$329Current price$241 (0.7x MSRP)$192 (0.6x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 1700 has 12% better value for money than i7-8700K.

Technical specs

Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 1700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)Threads1216Base clock speed3.7 GHz3 GHzBoost clock speed4.7 GHz3.7 GHzL1 cache64K (per core)768 KBL2 cache256K (per core)4096 KBL3 cache12288 KB16384 KBChip lithography14 nm14 nmDie size149 mm2192 mm2Maximum core temperature100 °Cno dataMaximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno dataNumber of transistorsno data4,800 million64 bit support++Windows 11 compatibility+-Unlocked multiplier+1

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 1700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)SocketFCLGA1151AM4Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 1700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTAES-NI++FMAno dataFMA3AVX++vPro+no dataEnhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no dataEnhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no dataTurbo Boost Technology2.0no dataHyper-Threading Technology+no dataTSX+no dataTSX+no dataIdle States+no dataThermal Monitoring+no dataSIPP+no dataXFRno data-SenseMIno data+

Security technologies

Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 1700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no dataEDB+no dataSecure Key+no dataMPX+no dataIdentity Protection+no dataSGXYes with Intel® MEno dataOS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 1700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++VT-d+no dataVT-x+no dataEPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 1700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4Maximum memory size128 GB64 GBMax memory channels22Maximum memory bandwidth41.6 GB/s42.671 GB/sECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 630-Max video memory64 GB-Quick Sync Video+-Clear Video+-Clear Video HD+-Graphics max frequency1.2 GHz-InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 1700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 1700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+-Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304@24Hz-Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304@60Hz-Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2304@60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 1700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 1700.

PCIe version3.0n/aPCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Core i7-8700K by 8% in our combined benchmark results.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Core i7-8700K by 8% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

Core i7-8700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 57% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

Core i7-8700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 27% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core i7-8700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 66% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core i7-8700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 33% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core i7-8700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 40% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Core i7-8700K by 44% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Core i7-8700K by 5% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Core i7-8700K by 4% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Core i7-8700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 31% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Core i7-8700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 33% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Core i7-8700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 11% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Core i7-8700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 107% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Core i7-8700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 51% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Core i7-8700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 17% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Core i7-8700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 20% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core.

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Core i7-8700K outperforms Ryzen 7 1700 by 39% in Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score 8.94 9.67 Recency 24 September 2017 22 February 2017 Cost $359 $329 Boost clock speed 4700 3700 Base clock speed 3700 3000 Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 1700. The differences in performance seem too small.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-8700K and Ryzen 7 1700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Core i7-8700K

Ryzen 7 1700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

Rate Intel Core i7-8700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate AMD Ryzen 7 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-8700K or Ryzen 7 1700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.