Amd a12 9720p radeon r7 so sánh hd 4400 năm 2024

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32020Compute units6no dataCore clock speed1021 MHz200 MHzBoost clock speed1021 MHz1100 MHzNumber of transistors950 million392 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm22 nmPower consumption (TDP)no data20 WattTexture fill rate17.1622.00Floating-point performance549.1 gflops46 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 M340 and HD Graphics 4400 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no dataInterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System SharedMaximum RAM amount4 GBSystem SharedMemory bus width128 Bit64/128 BitMemory clock speed1000 MHzSystem SharedMemory bandwidth16 GB/sno dataShared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputsEyefinity1no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no dataEnduro-no dataFreeSync1no dataHD3D+no dataPowerTune+no dataDualGraphics1no dataTrueAudio-no dataZeroCore+no dataSwitchable graphics1no dataQuick Syncno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_1)Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.44.3OpenCLNot Listed1.2Vulkan+1.1.80Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon R7 M340 outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by 28% in our combined benchmark results.

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon R7 M340 outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by 27% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Radeon R7 M340 outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by 51% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Radeon R7 M340 outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by 192% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Radeon R7 M340 outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by 112% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Radeon R7 M340 outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by 24% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Radeon R7 M340 outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by 86% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R7 M340 and HD Graphics 4400. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 74 Mh/s no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p14−16 12 Full HD14 10

Performance in popular games

Full HD Low Preset

Cyberpunk 20774−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

Full HD Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey1−2 0−1 Battlefield 51−2 0−1 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare10−11

+0%

10−11

+0%

Cyberpunk 20774−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

Far Cry 50−1 0−1 Far Cry New Dawn0−1 0−1 Forza Horizon 44−5

+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

Hitman 32−3

+100%

1−2

−100%

Horizon Zero Dawn2−3

+100%

1−2

−100%

Red Dead Redemption 24−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider7−8

+0%

7−8

+0%

Full HD High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey1−2 0−1 Battlefield 51−2 0−1 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare10−11

+0%

10−11

+0%

Cyberpunk 20774−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

Far Cry 50−1 0−1 Far Cry New Dawn0−1 0−1 Forza Horizon 44−5

+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

Hitman 32−3

+100%

1−2

−100%

Horizon Zero Dawn2−3

+100%

1−2

−100%

Metro Exodus2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

Red Dead Redemption 24−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider7−8

+0%

7−8

+0%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt7

+75%

4−5

−75%

Full HD Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey1−2 0−1 Battlefield 51−2 0−1 Cyberpunk 20774−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

Far Cry 50−1 0−1 Far Cry New Dawn0−1 0−1 Forza Horizon 44−5

+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt4

+0%

4−5

+0%

1440p High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare4−5

+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

Hitman 34−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

Horizon Zero Dawn8−9

+0%

8−9

+0%

Metro Exodus0−1 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 20−1 0−1 Shadow of the Tomb Raider5−6

+0%

5−6

+0%

1440p Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 20771−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Far Cry 53−4 2−3 Forza Horizon 40−1 0−1

4K High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

Hitman 32−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

Horizon Zero Dawn6−7

+0%

6−7

+0%

Red Dead Redemption 20−1 0−1

4K Ultra Preset

Far Cry 53−4

+0%

3−4

+0%

Far Cry New Dawn6−7 5−6 Forza Horizon 41−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

This is how R7 M340 and HD Graphics 4400 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

• R7 M340 is 16.7% faster than HD Graphics 4400

1080p resolution:

• R7 M340 is 40% faster than HD Graphics 4400

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

• in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R7 M340 is 100% faster than the HD Graphics 4400.

All in all, in popular games:

• R7 M340 is ahead in 11 tests (34%)
• there's a draw in 21 test (66%)

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score 1.71 1.34 Recency 16 June 2015 5 June 2013 Memory bus width 128 64 Pipelines / CUDA cores 320 20 Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm

The Radeon R7 M340 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4400 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Radeon R7 M340

HD Graphics 4400

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Rate AMD Radeon R7 M340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate Intel HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.