Who was not a part of the antislavery movement in the first part of the nineteenth century?

The abolitionist movement typically refers to the organized uprising against slavery that grew in the 30 years prior to the United States Civil War. However, slavery had existed in the United States since the founding of the colonies, and some people fought to abolish the practice from the time it was established. Long before the American Revolution, religious groups called for the end of slavery, and until the 13th Amendment formally ended it in 1865, abolitionist uprisings came in waves. However, for many Americans, slavery was more than just a practice—it was a way of life. People in both the North and the South fought the abolitionists. Many considered slavery to be part of the natural order, and they believed that any efforts to end slavery would divide the nation and destroy the country’s economy.

In the early years of the Republic, Congress passed some laws that supported abolitionist goals. It passed laws that prevented Americans from selling slaves to other countries, for instance. Congress also made attempts to end the abusive treatment of slaves during their transport from Africa. Still, by the 1830s, the United States had about two million slaves—nearly four times as many as in 1776, when the country declared its independence. Then, the abolitionists began to organize. They formed antislavery societies that drafted petitions calling for an end to slavery and sent them to Congress. They gave speeches and held conferences to promote their cause.

In 1833, the abolitionist movement became more aggressive. William Lloyd Garrison made a huge impact, largely through his publication, The Liberator. Garrison formed the American Anti-Slavery Society and proclaimed human enslavement to be a moral outrage; he and his group promoted their goals through methods of nonviolent protest. They made public speeches, produced antislavery literature, and boycotted cotton and other products that relied upon slave labor. Garrison’s goal was not simply to end slavery, however, but to end prejudice and promote racial justice. During the 1840s, the abolitionists formed political parties and continued the fight for racial equality. Like Garrison, they argued that human bondage was not only immoral, but unfitting of a country founded on the promise of freedom.

Fighting in the name of justice, the abolitionists had a powerful sway. By championing civil rights, they changed the political climate of the country. Both white and black people joined the movement, though they had different goals and ideas. Not all white abolitionists believed that blacks were equal to whites. While the white activists tended to limit their focus to ending slavery, the black activists were more likely to tackle the larger issue of promoting racial equality.

In recent years, historians studying abolition have explored the influence of black activism. Traditionally, historians have downplayed its significance, but more and more contemporary scholars believe it was critical to the movement. Manisha Sinha, along with some historians in the Caribbean who stressed the influence of the Haitian Slave Revolt and explore the role of the slave revolts in the Caribbean, believe black activists set the stage for a larger battle, establishing principles and practices that were used in later reform movements.

If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

journal article

The Journal of Southern History

Vol. 35, No. 3 [Aug., 1969]

, pp. 319-342 [24 pages]

Published By: Southern Historical Association

//doi.org/10.2307/2205761

//www.jstor.org/stable/2205761

Read and download

Log in through your school or library

Alternate access options

For independent researchers

Read Online

Read 100 articles/month free

Subscribe to JPASS

Unlimited reading + 10 downloads

With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.

Already have an account? Log in

Monthly Plan

• Access everything in the JPASS collection
• Read the full-text of every article
• Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep

Yearly Plan

• Access everything in the JPASS collection
• Read the full-text of every article
• Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep

Journal Information

The Journal of Southern History, which is edited at and sponsored by Rice University, is a quarterly devoted to the history of the American South and is unrestricted as to chronological period, methodology, or southern historical topic. The Journal publishes refereed articles and solicited book reviews and book notes on all aspects of southern history. As the organ of the Southern Historical Association, which is headquartered in the Department of History at the University of Georgia, the Journal also publishes items pertaining to the business of the Association as well as news and notices of interest to historians of and in the South. The purpose of the Southern Historical Association is to encourage the study of history in the South with an emphasis on the history of the South.

Publisher Information

The Southern Historical Association was organized on November 2, 1934 and charged with promoting an "investigative rather than a memorial approach" to southern history. Its objectives are the promotion of interest and research in southern history, the collection and preservation of the South's historical records, and the encouragement of state and local historical societies in the South. As a secondary purpose the Association fosters the teaching and study of all areas of history in the South. The Association holds an annual meeting, usually in the first or second week of November, and publishes The Journal of Southern History.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
The Journal of Southern History © 1969 Southern Historical Association
Request Permissions

Who led the anti

Who was involved in the anti

Who was the first anti

Who were five leaders of the abolition movement?