What part of the research paper presents the overall results of the study?
A good research paper has both qualities of good studies and good writing (Bordage, 2001). In addition, a research paper must be clear, short, and effective when presenting the information in an organized structure with a logical manner (Sandercock, 2013). Show
The results section is a section containing a description about the main findings of a research, whereas the discussion section interprets the results for readers and provides the significance of the findings. This section should not repeat the results section. Some of the common reasons the results and discussion sections might cause reviewers to reject a manuscript are (Bordage, 2001)
To avoid these problems, you can use an organized structure, such as outlines, points or subheadings, to write the results and discussion section. For the results, figures and tables must be clear so the readers understand the message (Hofmann, 2013). In the discussion section, outline your thoughts to defend your research and to emphasize the significance of your research. Use good writing, clear argumentations, and logical explanations in this section to support your conclusion (Hofmann, 2013). In this article, we provide tips and directions to construct a succinct and deeply informative results and discussion section. How to Organize the Results SectionSince your results follow your method section, you’ll provide information about what you found from the methods you used, such as your research data. You may also include information about the measurement of your data, variables, treatments, and statistical analyses. To start, organize your research data based on how important those are in relation to your research questions. This section should focus on showing important results that support or reject your research hypothesis. Include your least important data as supplemental materials when submitting to the journal. The next step is to prioritize your research data based on importance – focusing heavily on the information that directly relates to your research questions using the subheadings. The organization of the subheadings (subheading organization information below) for the results section usually mirrors the methods section. It should follow a logical and chronological order. Subheading organizationSubheadings within your results section are primarily going to detail major findings within each important experiment. And the first paragraph of your results section should be dedicated to your major findings (findings that answer your overall research question and lead to your conclusion) (Hofmann, 2013). In the book “Writing in the Biological Sciences,” author Angelika Hofmann recommends you to structure your results subsection paragraphs as follows:
Each subheading may contain a combination of (Bahadoran, 2019; Hofmann, 2013, pg. 62):
Decide on the best way to present your data — in the form of text, figures or tables (Hofmann, 2013). Data or Results?Sometimes we get confused about how to differentiate between data and results. Data are information that you collected from your research (Bahadoran, 2019). Whereas, results are the texts presenting the meaning of your research data (Bahadoran, 2019). One mistake that some authors often make is to use text to direct the reader to find a specific table or figure without further explanation. This can confuse the readers when they interpret the meaning of the data completely different from what the authors had in mind. So, you should briefly explain your results to make your information clear for the readers. Common Elements in Figures and TablesFigures and tables present information about your research data visually. The use of these visual illustrations is necessary so the readers can summarize, compare, and interpret large data at a glance. You can use graphs or figures to compare groups or patterns. Whereas, tables are ideal to present large quantities of data and exact values. Several elements are needed to create your figures and tables. These elements are important to sort your data based on groups (or treatments). It will be easier for the readers to see the similarities and differences among the groups. When presenting your research data in the form of figures and tables, organize your data based on the steps of the research leading you into a conclusion. Common elements of the figures (Bahadoran, 2019):
Tables in the result section may contain several elements (Bahadoran, 2019):
Tips to Write the Result Section
How to Organize the Discussion SectionIt’s not enough to use figures and tables in your result section to convince your readers about the importance of your findings. You need to support your result section by providing more explanation in the discussion section about what you found. The discussion section is probably the most creative section of your paper in terms of telling a story about your research (Ghasemi, 2019; Moore, 2016). In this section, based on your findings, you defend the answers to your research questions and create arguments to support your conclusions. Below is a list of questions to guide you when organizing the structure of your discussion section (Viera et al., 2018):
Organizing the Discussion SectionThe structure of the discussion section may be different from one paper to another, but it commonly has a beginning, middle-, and end- to the section. Present the contents of your section from narrow context (your study) to broader context (your field of study) (Ghasemi, 2019). One way to organize the structure of the discussion section is by dividing it into three parts (Ghasemi, 2019):
Another possible way to organize the discussion section is by using this structure (Viera et al., 2018; Docherty, 1999):
Finally, a last option is structuring your discussion this way (Hofmann, 2013, pg. 104):
Remember, at the heart of the discussion section is presenting an interpretation of your major findings. Tips to Write the Discussion Section
ReferencesAggarwal, R., & Sahni, P. (2018). The Results Section. In Reporting and Publishing Research in the Biomedical Sciences (pp. 21-38): Springer. Bahadoran, Z., Mirmiran, P., Zadeh-Vakili, A., Hosseinpanah, F., & Ghasemi, A. (2019). The principles of biomedical scientific writing: Results. International journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 17(2). Bordage, G. (2001). Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Academic medicine, 76(9), 889-896. Cals, J. W., & Kotz, D. (2013). Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part VI: discussion. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 66(10), 1064. Docherty, M., & Smith, R. (1999). The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers: Much the same as that for structuring abstracts. In: British Medical Journal Publishing Group. Faber, J. (2017). Writing scientific manuscripts: most common mistakes. Dental press journal of orthodontics, 22(5), 113-117. Fletcher, R. H., & Fletcher, S. W. (2018). The discussion section. In Reporting and Publishing Research in the Biomedical Sciences (pp. 39-48): Springer. Ghasemi, A., Bahadoran, Z., Mirmiran, P., Hosseinpanah, F., Shiva, N., & Zadeh-Vakili, A. (2019). The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Discussion. International journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 17(3). Hofmann, A. H. (2013). Writing in the biological sciences: a comprehensive resource for scientific communication. New York: Oxford University Press. Kotz, D., & Cals, J. W. (2013). Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part V: results. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 66(9), 945. Mack, C. (2014). How to Write a Good Scientific Paper: Structure and Organization. Journal of Micro/ Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, 13. doi:10.1117/1.JMM.13.4.040101 Moore, A. (2016). What's in a Discussion section? Exploiting 2‐dimensionality in the online world…. Bioessays, 38(12), 1185-1185. Peat, J., Elliott, E., Baur, L., & Keena, V. (2013). Scientific writing: easy when you know how: John Wiley & Sons. Sandercock, P. M. L. (2012). How to write and publish a scientific article. Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal, 45(1), 1-5. Teo, E. K. (2016). Effective Medical Writing: The Write Way to Get Published. Singapore Medical Journal, 57(9), 523-523. doi:10.11622/smedj.2016156 Van Way III, C. W. (2007). Writing a scientific paper. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 22(6), 636-640. Vieira, R. F., Lima, R. C. d., & Mizubuti, E. S. G. (2019). How to write the discussion section of a scientific article. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 41. What is the results part of a research paper?The Results (also sometimes called Findings) section in an empirical research paper describes what the researcher(s) found when they analyzed their data. Its primary purpose is to use the data collected to answer the research question(s) posed in the introduction, even if the findings challenge the hypothesis.
What part of a research paper presents the actual results of the analysis that you have made based on your chosen methodology?Definition. The results section is where you report the findings of your study based upon the methodology [or methodologies] you applied to gather information. The results section should state the findings of the research arranged in a logical sequence without bias or interpretation.
What part of a research paper gives an overview of the study by stating all of its major components?Often only 100 to 300 words, the abstract generally provides a broad overview and is never more than a page. It describes the essence, the main theme of the paper. It includes the research question posed, its significance, the methodology, and the main results or findings.
What part of a research paper presents the objective of the study?The research question, the objective or hypothesis of the study, helps to set up context for what you have researched and why you chose to study this particular topic. Therefore, it is included in the Introduction of the manuscript.
|